[OntVFR] OntVFR Digest, Vol 42, Issue 12 FJR discussions

Randle Taylor randle.taylor at gmail.com
Thu Aug 10 10:08:25 EDT 2017

I've ridden a 2016 FJR a few times. It is an absolute rocket ship, very
comfortable, handles well for such a heavy bike, and highly adjustable to
suit your needs but I agree with Brad's assessment on the engine
character.  A little too "clinical" or electrical for me but I feel the
same way about most I4's I've ridden.   It just lacks the visceral feeling
of a twin/triple/V4.

On 10 August 2017 at 09:59, mike mckinnon <2bikemike at gmail.com> wrote:

> Brad what do you mean by character?
> I've ridden my buds 2007 and now his 2016 replacement.   Both bikes feel
> like you're sitting on a reactor.  He put over 200k kliks on the 07 and not
> a glitch.  The throttle was power on demand.  That thig was a rocket.  But,
> egos like higher bars, adjustable, are what I consider better cuz I'm older
> in the back, even though my brain still likes to be 20.   My bud is also 65
> and he puts kliks on his bike traveling all over US and quebec and ontario
> to fjr &ST rallies cuz he had an ST before.  He is adiment the fjr is
> better all round.   Fjr has great luggage space with top case like my wing
> has.
> Oh ya it has a center stand standard the vfr 100 does not.
> So based on my experience and exposure to fjr my feelings about them are
> different.   If I was ever to change my vfr it would definitely be fjr.
> These days I putter on my c50t mostly but when it cools off I speed up to
> vfr for about 4-5hrs only.  I'm to cramped on vfr now to go longer.  The
> fjr is less cramped for me.  That would be another bonus I'd get on one.
> But retired with 3 bikes it's ok to keep the vfr as is with helli's as is.
>   When I need fast & powerful  the wing fills that bill.
> Besides busy, how else is Moncton for ya?
> On Aug 10, 2017 7:06 AM, "Taylor, Brad" <brad.taylor at tc.gc.ca> wrote:
>> I've been without a VFR for almost two years now as I sold my RWB 2007 in
>> the summer of 2015. I've been so busy since that I haven't even given
>> another bike much thought but when I take the plunge again it will probably
>> be for a VFR 1200. The additional power, great ergonomics, luggage an
>> appearance are just the right balance. I've looked at the FJR and at one
>> time it was at the top of my list but the motor lacks character, much like
>> many inline 4s and that is so important to me. My second choice would be a
>> Ducati Multistrada. Cost is the only thing that will probably keep me off a
>> Duc.
>> Brad Taylor
>> Civil Aviation Safety Inspector/Inspecteur de la sécurité de l'aviation
>> civile
>> -----Original Message-----
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 13:36:03 -0600
>> From: David Davidson <did at rogers.com>
>> To: "The Ontario VFR Club mailing list." <ontvfr at vfr.on.ca>
>> Subject: Re: [OntVFR] 1st time 25 yrs I am vfrless.
>> Message-ID: <C7B894F6-31CE-4FFE-ADC7-1316E907A0A6 at rogers.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> FJR's seem to have a universal following.  I'm thinking about a 97-02 ST,
>> probably more for value and reliability than anything else.
>> Happy to hear what others think...
>> ---David
>> > On Aug 9, 2017, at 12:20 PM, mike mckinnon <2bikemike at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Fjr is more like an enhanced vfr than the st.   More power and less
>> heavy dry weight.  Quick handling as needed.  With the top case it compares
>> to goldwing storage.
>> >
>> > Can you tell I like the fjr over ST?
>> >
>> > cheers
>> > 2bikemike
>> >
>> >> On Aug 9, 2017 1:02 PM, "David Davidson" <did at rogers.com> wrote:
>> >> John - any feedback on what the bike is like for riding 2 up? I'm
>> getting very close to joining the FJR/ST camp for better touring and riding
>> with a passenger.
>> >>
>> >> ---David
>> >>
>> >>> On Aug 9, 2017, at 7:52 AM, John Power <jksp1944 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Sold my Vfr and bought a 2009 CBF1000A. Find it is superior to a VFR
>> >>> in all respect especially touring. It is fast, handles excellent,
>> >>> great brakes and for long distance the stock seat is the best I have
>> >>> ever seen. VFR has great engine but is not even close to the
>> >>> CBF1000A in all other respects John Power
>> >>>
>> >>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Aug 9, 2017, at 12:17 AM, Peter Chang <pjchang at rogers.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sounds like the right choice..... If I wised up, I might make the
>> same choice.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 3 tanks of fuel through the vfr this year....
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:10 PM, quentin at lageer.com
>> >>>> <quentin at lageer.com> wrote:
>> >>>> Well it was a mixed emotions day, but my 92 has found a new home.
>> I have not been riding it very much over the last 3 or 4 years. Maybe
>> putting 2000km on a year if I was lucky. The last 2 years I didn't even
>> have it on the road at all.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My boys are really liking the kid size 4wheelers and I am sure my
>> bil is wishing I would get my own machine and the selling of the VFR was
>> the first step in daddy getting his own machine.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The vfr went to a nice guy in TO who works in Stoffville. So I am
>> sure that it will get more use then what what I am able to do.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So I will go back into lurking mode and enjoy the commentaries that
>> go on about reg/rec, oil vs wd40, tires, seargent vs Corbin, Dino vs
>> synth.... the list goes on.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So see yah on the 4wheeler trails.
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> OntVFR mailing list
>> OntVFR at vfr.on.ca
>> http://vfr.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/ontvfr_vfr.on.ca
> _______________________________________________
> OntVFR mailing list
> OntVFR at vfr.on.ca
> http://vfr.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/ontvfr_vfr.on.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://vfr.on.ca/pipermail/ontvfr_vfr.on.ca/attachments/20170810/c8bf165f/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the OntVFR mailing list